THE POSTMETOD ERA: TOWARD INFORMED
APPROACH
According
to Richard (2006) “communicative language teaching can be understood as a set
of principles about the goals of language teaching, how learners learn a
language, the kinds of classroom activities that best facilitate learning, and
the roles of teachers and learners in the classroom”.
Brown
(Characteristics of CLT Approach are:
1. Overall
goals: CLT focus on all of the components (grammatical, discourse, functional,
sociolinguistics, and strategic) of communicative competence.
2. Relationship
of form and function: Language techniques are designed to engage learners in
the pragmatic, authentic, functional use of language for meaningful purposes.
3. Fluency
and accuracy: a focus on students of comprehension and production and a focus
on the formal accuracy of production as seen as complementary principles
underlying communicative technique.
4. Focus
on real-world context: student should speak using the language, productively
and receptively, in rehearsed contexts outside the classroom.
5. Autonomy
and strategic involvement: students are given the opportunity to focus on their
own learning process through raising their awareness on their own learning
style through development of strategies for production and comprehension.
6. Teacher
roles: to facilitate and guide the students in learning process by interaction.
7. Student
roles: students are active participants in their own learning process.
Richard
(2006) mention that Communicative competence includes the following aspects of
language knowledge:
1. Communicative
competence includes the following aspects of language knowledge:
2. Knowing
how to use language for a range of different purposes functions
3. Knowing
how to vary our use of language according to the setting and the participants
(e.g., knowing when to use formal and informal speech or when to use language
appropriately for written as opposed to spoken communication)
4. Knowing how to produce and understand
different types of texts (e.g., narratives, reports, interviews, conversations)
Knowing how to maintain communication despite having limitations in one’s
language knowledge (e.g., through using different kinds of communication
strategies)
A Task Based Approach
Task
-based learning offers an alternative for language teachers. In a task-based
lesson the teacher doesn't pre-determine what language will be studied, the
lesson is based around the completion of a central task and the language
studied is determined by what happens as the students complete it. The lesson
follows certain stages.Task-based learning focuses on the use of authentic
language through meaningful tasks such as visiting the doctor or a telephone
call. This method encourages meaningful
communication and is student-centered .
Characteristics:
1. Students
are encouraged to use language creatively and spontaneously through tasks and
problem solving.
2. Students
focus on a relationship that is comparable to real world activities
3. The
conveyance of some sort of meaning is central to this method
4. Assessment
is primarily based on task outcome
5. TBLT
is student-centered
Task-based
learning has some clear advantages:
1. The
students are free of language control. In all three stages they must use all
their language resources rather than just practicing one pre-selected item.
2. A
natural context is developed from the students' experiences with the language
that is personalized and relevant to them. With PPP it is necessary to create
contexts in which to present the language and sometimes they can be very
unnatural.
3. The
students will have a much more varied exposure to language with TBL. They will
be exposed to a whole range of lexical phrases, collocations and patterns as
well as language forms.
4. The
language explored arises from the students' needs. This need dictates what will
be covered in the lesson rather than a decision made by the teacher or the course
book.
5. It
is a strong communicative approach where students spend a lot of time
communicating. PPP lessons seem very teacher-centred by comparison. Just watch
how much time the students spend communicating during a task-based lesson.
6. It
is enjoyable and motivating.
TBLT
is also revealing its weaknesses. Broady
(2006) notes that TBLT may not provide sufficient "Interaction
Opportunities." Bruton (2005)
identifies other concerns:
1. There
is no acquisition of new grammar or vocabulary features
2. Everything
is left to the teacher
3. Not
all students are or will be motivated by TBLT
4. Some
students need more guidance and will not or cannot `notice´ language forms
(grammar) or other elements of accuracy
5. Students
typically translate and use a lot of their L1 rather than the target language
in completing the tasks.
Learner-centered Instruction
Weimer
(2012) states, “Active learning, student engagement and other strategies that
involve students and mention learning are called learner-centered”..
The
characteristics are:
1. 1.
Learner-centered teaching engages students in the hard, messy work of learning.
2. Learner-centered
teaching includes explicit skill instruction
3. Learner-centered
teaching encourages students to reflect on what they are learning and how they
are learning it.
4. Learner-centered
teaching motivates students by giving them some control over learning
processes.
5. Learner-centered
teaching encourages collaboration
Cooperative Learning
Cooperative
learning is a successful teaching strategy in which small teams, each with students of different levels of ability, use a
variety of learning activities to improve their understanding of a subject.
Each member of a team is responsible not only for learning what is taught but
also for helping teammates learn, thus creating an atmosphere of achievement.
Interactive Learning
Interactive
learning is a more hands-on, real-world process of relaying information in
classrooms. Passive learning relies on listening to teachers lecture or rote
memorization of information, figures, or equations. But with interactive
learning, students are invited to participate in the conversation, through
technology (online reading and math programs, for instance) or through
role-playing group exercises in class.
How
does it help? In addition to engaging students who are raised in a
hyper-stimulated environment, interactive learning sharpens critical thinking
skills, which are fundamental to the development of analytic reasoning. A child
who can explore an open-ended question with imagination and logic is learning
how to make decisions, as opposed to just regurgitating memorized information.
Also, interactive learning teaches children how to collaborate and work
successfully in groups, an indispensible skill as workplaces become more
team-based in structure
Whole Language Education
Two interconnected concepts are
brought together into whole language education:
1. The
wholeness of language implies that language is not the sun of its many
dissectible and discrete parts.
2. Whole
language is a perspective because we use language to construct meaning and
construct reality. Teaching language enables to understand a system of social
practices.
The
term came from reading research and was used to emphasize:
1. The
wholeness of language as opposed to view that fragmented language into its
bits, and piece of phonemes, graphemes, morphemes, and words.
2. The
interaction and interconnection between oral language and written language
3. The
importance, in literate societies, of the written code as natural and
developmental, just as the oral code is.
Content-based
Instruction
Stoller
(2008) states, “Content-based Instruction refers to the use of nonlanguage
subject matter that is closely aligned with traditional school subjects, themes
of interest to students, or vocational and occupational areas”. Most content‐based settings have
strong academic orientations, emphasizing the linguistic, cognitive, and
metacognitive skills as well as subject matter that students need to succeed in
future educational endeavors.
REFERENCE
Jack
C. Richard. 2006. Communicative Language
Teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
H.
Douglas Brown. 2001. Teaching by
Principles An Interactive Approach Language Pedagogy. San Francisco:
Longman
Task Based language Teaching. Accessed
on 3 October 2018 from https://sites.educ.ualberta.ca/staff/olenka.bilash/Best%20of%20Bilash/taskbasedlanguageteaching.html
Consumer
Guide. (June, 1992). Cooperative Learning.
Acceseed on 3 October 2018 from https://www2.ed.gov/pubs/OR/ConsumerGuides/cooplear.html
1992
Scholastic.Undersanding Interactive Learning. Accessed on 3 October 2018 from https://www.scholastic.com/parents/family-life/social-emotional
learning/technology-and-kids/understanding-interactive-learning.html
Spinger
Link. (2008). Content Based Instruction. Accessed
on 3 October 2018 from https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-0-387-30424-3_89
No comments:
Post a Comment